For those of us who have worked around FDA-regulated computer systems for many years, the conversation around validation has changed quite a bit. Years ago, the focus was often on whether a validation package existed and whether the required documents were in place. That still matters, but it is no longer enough. Today, FDA investigators are far more interested in whether the system is actually controlled, whether the records it generates can be trusted, and whether the company can explain the decisions behind its validation approach.
This is especially important for medical device companies as they operate under the QMSR environment and continue to manage expectations around 21 CFR Part 11, data integrity, audit trails, vendor oversight, and risk-based software assurance. Many organizations still have legacy systems that were validated under older CSV models. The documentation may exist, but the system may have changed, the process may have changed, the vendor may have released updates, or the way users interact with the system may no longer match the original validation assumptions.
These are the gaps that often surface during an audit. A system may be considered “validated,” but the risk assessment may not support the actual use of the system. Testing may not reflect the critical functions that affect product quality or patient safety. Audit trails may be turned on, but review practices may be inconsistent. A SaaS vendor may be managing frequent updates, but the company may not have a clear process for assessing the impact of those changes. These issues are rarely theoretical. They are the kinds of practical weaknesses that can make an inspection much harder to defend.
This webinar will help medical device companies take a realistic look at FDA computer system audit readiness. The session will connect traditional CSV expectations with FDA’s Computer Software Assurance approach, GAMP®5 2nd Edition principles, 21 CFR Part 11, data integrity, SDLC documentation, QMSR-related inspection expectations, and vendor oversight. Rather than treating validation as a one-time documentation exercise, the program will focus on how companies can build and maintain defensible control over systems used in FDA-regulated activities.
Attendees will learn how to identify GxP systems, evaluate risk, document validation activities, maintain systems in a validated state, and prepare the policies, procedures, and supporting evidence needed for an FDA inspection. The session will also address practical areas that frequently create audit exposure, including weak change control, incomplete audit trail practices, unclear vendor responsibilities, outdated validation packages, and systems that have drifted away from their original validated state.
The goal is to help attendees understand what FDA computer system audit readiness really means in today’s medical device environment: not just having documents available, but being able to show that computerized systems are fit for intended use, properly controlled, and capable of supporting data integrity, product quality, and patient safety throughout the system life cycle.
Carolyn Troiano has more than 35 years of experience in computer system validation in the tobacco, pharmaceutical, medical device and other FDA-regulated industries. She has worked directly, or on a consulting basis, for many of the larger pharmaceutical and tobacco companies in the US and Europe. She is currently building an FDA computer system validation compliance strategy at a vapor company. Carolyn has participated in industry conferences, and is currently active in the Association of Information Technology Professionals (AITP), and Project Management Institute (PMI) chapters in the Richmond, VA area. Carolyn also volunteers for the PMI’s Educational Fund as a project management instructor for non-profit organizations.